Re: SR theory is simplistic


"G" <gehan_ameresekere@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1176771553.963974.33990@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

4. The results of high speed reenactments of the Ives Stilwell
experiment disagree with the emission theory

The results of the Sagnac experiment disagree with Ives and Stillwell.
Fortunately technology makes use of Sagnac.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Sagnac/Sagnac.htm
Nobody bothers with Ives and Stillwell.

http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-07/2-07.htm

" This analysis is perfectly valid in both the classical and the
relativistic contexts."

How to prove mathpages wrong?

Look at the *lowest* level.

"Prominent theoretical physicists were therefore more inclined to reject the principle of relativity"- Einstein. (http://www.bartleby.com/173/7.html)

Now, the principle of relativity says that my if my desk is orbiting
the sun at 30,000.000 km/sec and my monitor is orbiting the sun at 29,999.999 km/sec, then my monitor is moving away from my desk at
30,000 - 29,999.999 = 1 metre/sec.

The fact that my monitor doesn't move away from my desk yet
orbits the sun (along with me, you and everything else on Earth)
shows that the principle of relativity is absolutely perfect and only
a prominent theoretical fool would reject it.

Einstein doesn't name these prominent theoretical idiots or he'd be
sued in a court-of-law. He's the only prominent theoretical moron
that would reject it.

This very same prominent theoretical moron also states:
"In short, let us assume that the simple law of the constancy of the velocity of light c (in vacuum) is justifiably believed by the child at school."

1) In short, I'm not a child at school.
2) In short, I don't make assumptions.
3) In short, every child in school knows what the principle of relativity is, has done since Copernicus discovered the Earth orbits the Sun and not the other way around.

"In view of this dilemma [What dilemma?] there appears to be nothing else for it than to abandon either the principle of relativity or the simple law of the propagation of light in vacuo" - Prominent theoretical imbecile.

But anyway, here's the proof.
Sagnac sends light in both directions at the same time.
For it to be "observed" to have the same speed in both directions
we need time dilation plus length contraction in one direction,
and time contraction plus length dilation in the other direction.
I have only one wristwatch and one ruler.
Time dilation and time contraction cannot both be measured
with one device, and it is the "stationary" observer that sees
c, the "moving" observer that sees c+v and c-v.
Thus by the principle of relativity the apparatus is stationary
and the observer runs around it, dilating his wristwatch.
DO NOT WATCH Sagnac in operation, it will slow your heart
down.

By reductio-ad-absurdum, Sagnac actually works and Einstein
was a raving, ranting lunatic.
My analysis is perfectly valid in both the classical and the
relativistic contexts, and mathpages analysis is incomplete.

Moreover, the illustration is wrong on http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-07/2-07.htm
The start and end points do not move relatively to each other, they rotate together.







.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SR theory is simplistic
    ... the principle of relativity says that my if my desk is orbiting ... the sun at 30,000.000 km/sec and my monitor is orbiting the sun at 29,999.999 km/sec, then my monitor is moving away from my desk at ... Sagnac sends light in both directions at the same time. ... Time dilation and time contraction cannot both be measured ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR theory is simplistic
    ... the principle of relativity says that my if my desk is orbiting ... Sagnac sends light in both directions at the same time. ... Time dilation and time contraction cannot both be measured ... and the observer runs around it, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Some real Dingleberies
    ... interpretations to the Lorentz transform which includes LET and SR. ... Muon decay, as I understand, shows time dilation ... There are no experiments that do not obey the principle of relativity ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
    ... You only observed the one-way time dilation, ... the violation in the principle of relativity. ... observation invalidates the Lorentz transform. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: a few questions about SR and its adherents
    ... You only observed the one-way time dilation, ... the violation in the principle of relativity. ... The Lorentz transformation is a prediction _of_ the principle of ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)