Re: Trajectory


"harry" <harald.vanlintelButNotThis@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1176722455_1151@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Spirit of Truth" <juneharton@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7GyUh.8996$u03.6887@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

What is the trajectory of an electron circling an atom in a spaceship
going at half c?

Using some kind of Bohr model? Obviously that depends on the atom. Here
follows a little sketch, beware of possible errors. For the hydrogen atom,
its radius is 0.053 nm and its proper circling speed is 2.2E6 m/s, which
is <<0.5c. Thus in hydrogen, I get a proper frequency of about 6500 THz,
time dilated 5600 THz. Then, ignoring atomic motions, I'd say that you can
describe its trajectory as a straight line with a small superimposed
transverse fluctuation of 0.053 nm and with a period length of about 26
nm. But why do you ask?

Harald

Because I don't believe we can ignore the atomic motions in the moving
system....as each particle ''circles'', it's trajectory is radically
effected
by being in a moving system and has _various_ time dilations effecting it
......


I have long been concerned with Einstein's ''Time dilation"
and "Lack of simultaneity".

After a lot of help and much enquiry into these matters from
many many works I have deduced the following:

Time dilation is synonymous with speed of process change
e.g. aging at a slower rate and is not a slowing down of "Time"
in a so-called time dimension. After all, if something went
slower in classical-sense time it would disappear out of
our now flowing existence!

Lack of simultaneity is incorrect. There no length contraction
contrary to such ideas in relativity (both SR and GR), and
it's counterpart the Ether length contraction concept.

The actual answer is as follows:

Time dilation is spherical....

Time dilation is spherical, greatest in the direction of motion, least in
the transverse direction, and opposite in the reverse direction to the
motion, where change is speeded up.

There is no length contraction nor lack of simultaneity....

Relativity does not demand length contraction. To be actually RELATIVE
to such a thing as Einstein's relativity, calculations such as M-M's have to
EQUAL the AT REST condition NOT a length contraction to equal the
transverse return distance.

It has to equal the SAME DISTANCE for c gap closure in all directions
as the AT REST observation of the traveling c.

The Time element has to be brought back to 2L / C return connected
with the direction of motion, the transverse direction, and the reverse
to direction of motion.

Related to the above, the gamma equation only functions in the transverse
direction as you will see below.

Orienting to first the direction of motion Time is dilated as follows:
Rest Time divided by 1-V/C.

Then, Transverse to the direction of motion:
Rest Time divided by SqRt 1-Vsq/Csq [= t x gamma (y)].

Then opposite to direction of motion:
Rest Time divided by 1+V/C.

Simultaneity is thus also regained for all observers by this fact.

The false concept of lack of simultaneity which leads inevitably to the
block-time/ frozen river of time concept (The Fabric Of The Cosmos
by Brian Greene) which falsely concludes that THE actual past and
future exist at all times and thus there would be no free will is thus
debunked by Simultaneous Relativity [SR - new definition].

Now, you may ask how time in a moving system can have different
time dilations. The answer is that it is each particle that has the
dilation depending on it's various motions in the moving system.
The time dilations are simply based on c being c for all observers
AND the simple trajectory differences that each lightwave/particle
has for the observer of the moving system compared to the
observer at rest.


Do the math, it finally works.

:)


Spirit


Copyright: Spirit of Truth
Sept. 13th, 2006
Modified Oct. 19, 2006
Modified Mar. 10, 2007

(using June's e-mail to communicate to you)!


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Trajectory
    ... What is the trajectory of an electron circling an atom in a spaceship ... by being in a moving system and has _various_ time dilations effecting it ... it's counterpart the Ether length contraction concept. ... motion, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
    ... contracts along the axis of motion. ... should be obvious that length contraction along the axis of motion does ... always assume the intelligent observer who knows, for instance, that it ... acceleration would NOT be accompanied by inertial forces (in other ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: A Revision of the Relativistic Lorentz-Fitzgerald Transformation
    ... contracts along the axis of motion. ... should be obvious that length contraction along the axis of motion does ... always assume the intelligent observer who knows, for instance, that it ... The correct solution may also involve the possibility that energy is ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: c+v and c-v or not?
    ... bodies carried forward in the earth's motion undergo a deformation. ... But its true velocity (I mean this time, ... the amount of contraction being just sufficient to ... Light travelling between source and target has a constant speed c ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • PoP10
    ... MMX and Contraction ... wrote in his 1897 paper The Relativity of Space: ... bodies carried forward in the earth's motion undergo a deformation. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)