Re: Physics on the lowest level of our reality!
- From: "Gerald L. O'Barr" <globarr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Apr 2007 15:26:27 -0700
anod <tty82...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Gerald L. O'Barr" <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Physics on the lowest level of our reality!
Our reality, on the lowest level, must be simple.
It has to be simple. It has to be the simplest of
all possible simplicity, because it has to be able
to explain the simplest things we know, as well as
the most complicated things we know. And just how
simple must it be? Our reality is just a simple,
two element existence, just simple space and
simple matter existing in that space.
Matter exists in individual particles distributed
throughout this space, basically having random
distributions in positions, orientations, shapes,
sizes and motions. The most basic (only?)
property present is inertia found in matter.
If anyone is paying attention, we have just
. . .
anod <tty82...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
i was until you just asked, why asking,
was it crap? . . .
(O'Barr note: This is my second try at responding.
I must assume the first got lost somewhere?)
O'Barr comments:
It all depends on you. For all those who have no
interest in understanding our fundamental reality, it
might be the word you just used. For all those who
might not understand math, it might be this word you
have used. So you see, only you can answer this
question. What is it, according to your estimation?
Before you answer this, please note the
following: What I have presented is well presented.
It is mathematical. It is carefully stated and can
be given a responsible assessment and a responsible
response. And the day will come when the entire
world will know that you saw this, and they will know
how you responded.
I know that what is being said here is
confirmable, it is testable, it has passed every test
that I have so far given it. And I know that it is
worthy of your best efforts to understand it and to
consider it. I am not playing games on this specific
subject. It has been presented a number of different
times, in a number of different ways, but the math
remains the same.
Thanks for reading.
Gerald L O'Barr <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx>
++++++++++++Remove ... for e-mail.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Physics on the lowest level of our reality!
- From: genuine advantage
- Re: Physics on the lowest level of our reality!
- References:
- Physics on the lowest level of our reality!
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Physics on the lowest level of our reality!
- From: anod
- Physics on the lowest level of our reality!
- Prev by Date: Re: Light speed in emission theory
- Next by Date: Re: Light speed in emission theory
- Previous by thread: Re: Physics on the lowest level of our reality!
- Next by thread: Re: Physics on the lowest level of our reality!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|