Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.

On May 2, 1:20 am, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
On 1 May 2007 18:59:46 -0700, Jerry <Cephalobus_alie...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On May 1, 6:51 pm, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
Consider a diffraction grating positioned perpendicular to light coming from a
star that is moving towards Earth at v.

As we know, the light is diffracted at certain angles determined by an equation
that contains no light speed term. Relativists have used this fact in arguments
against the BaTh, claiming that a diffraction grating would not work at all if
the BaTh was correct.

The diffracted angles are indicators of doppler shift and are used to determine
v.

If now the grating is moved away at velocity v, so that it is at rest wrt the
star, the question arises as to why these angles should change to indicate zero
doppler shift. The light certainly hasn't been physically affected in any way
by the grating's movement and the angles are supposed to be 'wavelength
dependent' only.

This is just another proof that SR is nothing but a futile circular maths
theory which has no connection with the physical world.

WAR IS PEACE
SAGNAC PROVES BATH
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
DIFFRACTION GRATINGS DISPROVE SR
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
- from "2007", by George Henri Orwell Wilson

You don't like the fact that the BaTh is now a complete theory. Even cepheid
velocity curves are in the right phase.
...and anyone who has eric geese on side must be wrong,

You have not shown any complete fits to multiband luminosity AND
radial velocity data to binary stars or Cepheids. You have not
fit orbiting pulsar data. You have not shown the ability to match
Shapiro delay. You have not shown any equations describing your
theory of diffraction grating behavior. All you have done is make
claims that you "can" fit the data.

Your record of accurate fits still stands at ZERO, and you have
no math to back you up. Your are fantasizing.

Jerry


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
    ... from a star that is moving towards Earth at v. ... equation that contains no light speed term. ... Relativists have used this ... grating would not work at all if the BaTh was correct. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
    ... star that is moving towards Earth at v. ... that contains no light speed term. ... the BaTh was correct. ... the question arises as to why these angles should change to indicate zero ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
    ... star that is moving towards Earth at v. ... that contains no light speed term. ... the BaTh was correct. ... the question arises as to why these angles should change to indicate zero ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Time Dilation disappears
    ... star light curves. ... If you would care to take a genuine interest in BaTh, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Time Dilation disappears
    ... star light curves. ... If you would care to take a genuine interest in BaTh, ... perfect absorber, it will not reflect any radiation, and will ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Loading