Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: bz <bz+spr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 09:24:17 +0000 (UTC)
"guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx" <guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:1178085610.863662.57900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
On May 1, 5:46 am, bz <bz+...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:.....
"g...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
innews:1177995332.605199.251900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
(b) the s-orbital is spherical and the Bohr orbit is not
Bohr's orbit isn't circular? then what is it squarical?
Circular is not spherical.
Bohr's orbitals ALL lie in the same plane.
Bohr's model is disproved by the bonding of molecules.
There is an obediance (non-random and non cloudy/fuzzy) of perfect
INTEGER symmetry that is "demanded" in the GEOMETRY of the atom for
the Table of Elements to obey the quantum principle and for the
electron's nescessity to shed or gain light at specific intervals in
this geometry.
What 'electron"s nescessity to shed or gain light at specific intervals'???
It is a no dice game.Einstein said something similar. You are no Einstein.
--
bz
please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.
bz+spr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- References:
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: bz
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- Prev by Date: Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- Next by Date: Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- Previous by thread: Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- Next by thread: Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
