Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- From: PD <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 2 May 2007 15:03:31 -0700
On May 2, 4:56 pm, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
On 2 May 2007 11:06:20 -0700, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 2, 1:17 am, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
Are you suggesting that the movement of the grating somehow changes the
(absolute) wavelength of the light?
No such thing as (absolute) wavelength of light. That would be the
point.
The whole basis of modern metrology is the ABSOLUTE wavelengths of light.
I don't know *where* you would have gotten such a stupid idea.
Modern metrology is based on wavelengths from a source with zero
relative motion. Read the instruction manual that comes with your
metrology standards kit.
PD
.
- References:
- Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- From: PD
- Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- Prev by Date: Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- Next by Date: Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- Previous by thread: Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- Next by thread: Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- Index(es):