Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- From: "Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 00:38:51 +1000
"kenseto" <kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1178374474.794150.222490@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On May 4, 10:49 am, "Jeckyl" <n...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"kenseto" <kens...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageWell....derr. frequency times universal wavelength gives varying
The speed of arrival of incoming light from a relative source is as
follows:
Speed of arrival of incoming light = c' =(detected frequency of
incoming light)(the universal wvaelength of that light)
Well .. derr. frequency times wavelength gives velocity.
velocity.
No .. varying frequency times inversely varying wavelength gives universal
velocity.
The experimental evidence is completely against emission theory and fully in
support of SR. We eve look at the variation of wavelength to determine speed
that starts move relative to us. That would be impossible is wavelength
were fixed.
.
- References:
- Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- From: ca314159
- Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- From: Pentcho Valev
- Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- From: kenseto
- Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- From: kenseto
- Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- Prev by Date: Re: Borg's Laws. Maybe close to someonelse's.
- Next by Date: Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- Previous by thread: Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- Next by thread: Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|