Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
- From: "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 12:07:10 GMT
"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:6e7%h.159891$Nj.1164379@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1178399218.606386.80190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxOn May 5, 12:37 pm, heretic <here...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
The physical singularity at the horizon cannot be transformed away.
Nobody here is claiming that it can.
I think "Heretic" = Ken Tucker in disguise :-)
Or perhaps "Heretic" = "LEJ Brouwer" in an even
more devious disguise.
Interesting.
Dirk Vdm
.
- References:
- Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
- From: LEJ Brouwer
- Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
- From: LEJ Brouwer
- Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
- From: heretic
- Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
- Prev by Date: Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- Next by Date: Re: The Modulus Project
- Previous by thread: Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
- Next by thread: Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
