Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: bz <bz+spr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 09:58:46 +0000 (UTC)
"guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx" <guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:1178526326.486708.25780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Under Bohr's theory, that is correct. And under Bohr's theory, they fall
into the nucleus very quickly.
My point was your canon ball. The canon ball does NOT undergo constant
acceleration.
It does. 32 ft/sec^2 acceleration toward the center of the earth. Absent
that acceleration it would travel in a straight line.
-10 points.
-90 points for failure to do the other homework problems.
For the same reason (excluding friction) the canon don't crash into
the Earth...the electron don't crash into the nucleus.
This should not affect Bohr's theory. You're talking about angular
acceleration and this is invisble both to the electron and the canon.
The electron and canon are in ****their**** opinion not accelerating,
thus neither needs to radiate anything.
The electron and canon are in their opinion traveling at a constant
velocity.
The electrons in a cyclotron and the electrons in a magnetron 'in their own
optionion' are not accelerating. But they are radiating.
- 10 points
IF THEY WERE TO FEEL ANYTHING AT ALL THEN THEY WOULD BE
****************SLOWING DOWN***********
The electrons in a cyclotron and in a magnetron are not slowing down.
-10 points.
Again. Bohrs theory fails to explain why electrons in orbit around atomic
nucleii do not radiate, this is ONE of the reasons the theory was
abandoned.
You better start doing your homework.
--
bz
please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.
bz+spr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- References:
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: bz
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: bz
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: bz
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: bz
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: bz
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: bz
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: bz
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- Prev by Date: Re: Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?
- Next by Date: Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- Previous by thread: Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- Next by thread: Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading