Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- From: "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 14:11:16 +0200
Henri Wilson wrote:
The basic BaTh equation is derived at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/bathgrating.jpg
'v' is hte speed of the garating away from the source.
Assume the diffracted light moves at c wrt the grating.
The first order equation is: sin(phi) = c/(c+v).D/lambda.
Why do I find wrong calculations so funny? :-)
Why do I find it hilarious when somebody defend
an obviously wrong calculation even after it is pointed
out that it is wrong? :-)
Keep it up, Henri,
make an even bigger fool of yourself every time
you claim your calculation to be correct.
The sky is the limit - go for it! :-)
Paul
.
- References:
- Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- From: Jerry
- Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- From: Jerry
- Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- From: PD
- Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- Prev by Date: Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- Next by Date: Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
- Previous by thread: Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- Next by thread: Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|