Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass

On May 8, 1:16 pm, Bilge <dubi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2007-05-08, v...@xxxxxxxxxxxx <v...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<snip>

Regardless of what you think about me, John posed a simple question
and the geometrical argument provided by Tom and you does not provide

The answers has been explained to both you and mr. kennaugh numerous
times and in great detail. The fact that you are still asking the same
non-sequitur indicates that you and mr. kennaugh need to find new hobbies.
Neither of you have the capacity for the depth of thought required to
understand the physical basis for the answer. Your comprehension of
physics is so superficial that even the simplest physics eludes your
grasp. Go study on your own for a while. Everyone who has wasted their
efforts on you and mr. kennaugh over the years has exhibited a great
deal more patience than either of you deserve.- Hide quoted text -

That's bull*** Bilge; you're just an ***. Show me even one other
post in the history of this group where in the context of your
"geometry" argument, anyone has discussed why the motion of the source
does not affect the speed of emitted light.

Do you agree with Jeckyl's post that the "geometry" of the universe
has no effect in the FOR of the source, but only affects things in
other FORs?

Vern

.