Re: O'Barr: In Special Relativity, Velocity is not always Relative.
- From: karandash2000@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 9 May 2007 07:57:01 -0700
On May 9, 7:25 am, "harry" <harald.vanlintelButNotT...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"Gerald L. O'Barr" <glob...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:1178717195.241109.134270@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
O'Barr: In Special Relativity, Velocity is not always Relative.
That is well known; the all too simple notion that "velocity is always
relative" is at the heart of for example the Twin paradox, the Ehrenfest
paradox and the Bell rocket paradox.
Sorry for snipping; but when rapidly going over it, I got the impression
that you try to make a point that doesn't need to be made as it is well
accepted. Do you disagree?
Regards,
Harald
Really, O'Harry?
Are you getting confused by the accelerated motion in SR (as in TP,
BP) again? You are quoting the wrong examples again. They contain non-
symmetric situations, you conveniently forgot that. Using irrelevant
examples again?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- O'Barr: In Special Relativity, Velocity is not always Relative.
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: O'Barr: In Special Relativity, Velocity is not always Relative.
- From: harry
- O'Barr: In Special Relativity, Velocity is not always Relative.
- Prev by Date: Re: O'Barr: In Special Relativity, Velocity is not always Relative.
- Next by Date: Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
- Previous by thread: Re: O'Barr: In Special Relativity, Velocity is not always Relative.
- Next by thread: Re: O'Barr: In Special Relativity, Velocity is not always Relative.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|