Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass

"Bilge" <dubious@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrnf43pbd.2b17.dubious@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 2007-05-09, vern@xxxxxxxxxxxx <vern@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 8, 1:16 pm, Bilge <dubi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2007-05-08, v...@xxxxxxxxxxxx <v...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<snip>

Regardless of what you think about me, John posed a simple question
and the geometrical argument provided by Tom and you does not provide

The answers has been explained to both you and mr. kennaugh numerous
times and in great detail. The fact that you are still asking the same
non-sequitur indicates that you and mr. kennaugh need to find new
hobbies.
Neither of you have the capacity for the depth of thought required to
understand the physical basis for the answer. Your comprehension of
physics is so superficial that even the simplest physics eludes your
grasp. Go study on your own for a while. Everyone who has wasted their
efforts on you and mr. kennaugh over the years has exhibited a great
deal more patience than either of you deserve.- Hide quoted text -

That's bull*** Bilge; you're just an ***.


It is not bull*** and if not putting up with bull*** from people
who want to pontificate on subjects they know nothing about makes
me an ***, then I'm an *** (or anything else you want to
call me). Ignorance is not a crime, but your choice to disregard
all of the attempts to enlighten you and instead deliberately remain
remain ignorant, is inexcusable.


Show me even one other
post in the history of this group where in the context of your
"geometry" argument, anyone has discussed why the motion of the source
does not affect the speed of emitted light.

Try the search feature at http://groups.google.com

Do you agree with Jeckyl's post that the "geometry" of the universe
has no effect in the FOR of the source, but only affects things in
other FORs?

That is not what he said and attempting to straighten out your
misunderstanding is not worth the effort, since you have never
once made the slightest effort to understand anything which
might jeopardize your 15th century grasp of physical phenomena.

What I said was that from the FoR of the source, the light is emitted at,
and measured at, c .. it never goes faster or slower than c as far as the
source is concerned, so there needs to be no explanation of what makes it
NOT travel at c from the FoR the source, because it always DOES travel at c
from the FoR of the source.

And in every other FoR, the light ALSO is measured as going at c. No FoR
ever measures it going slower or faster than c. So there is no mechanism
required to make it slow down or speed up .. because it doesn't.

What there DOES need to be is a 'geometry' that explains how the different
FoR all measure the same speed for light.


.