Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
- From: karandash2000@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 9 May 2007 20:53:18 -0700
On May 9, 6:36 pm, v...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 4 mayo, 16:55, karandash2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On May 2, 5:09 am, v...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
<Raphaelshito's cretinisms snipped>
Your misunderstanding among the "E" I used in my first post and the
potential energies E_0 and E_1 used by Einstein is explained in
another post of this thread.
RVHG (Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato)- Hide quoted text -
Listen , old fart
The paper has only a handful of very simple equations, ok? So, even a
freshman can understand them.
I understand that you went to school in Cuba but I thought that the
commies had a pretty good education system. Are you home schooled?
See, H and E have the same meaning, TOTAL ENERGY.
So, when Einstein calculates H0-E0 and H1-E1 , these differences have
the meaning of kinetic energy K0,1. No mention of any potential
energy, fartso. How many days before your pension for this month
arrives?
See my answer in all detail in another part of this thread ( a little
up).
RVHG(Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato)
Bye , old fart. Go back to counting the days before pension check
arrives.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
- From: valls
- Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
- From: karandash2000
- Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
- From: valls
- Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
- Prev by Date: Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
- Next by Date: Re: Dual to Black Hole question
- Previous by thread: Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
- Next by thread: Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity
- Index(es):