Re: Bohr's Atom still number one

On May 9, 5:32 am, bz <bz+...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"g...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote innews:1178686901.552915.67220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

On May 8, 3:40 pm, bz <bz+...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The explanation given athttp://bethe.cornell.edu/
(if I understood it correctly) is that 'not even the electrons know
where they are' to a high enough accuracy to be able to 'accelerate'
while they are in their 'orbitals'.

Their location is so uncertain that the probability plots ARE the
correct 'picture'.

They say you can know when you know their location, you can't know
their velocity ....and vice-versa?

'they' are only approximately correct.



(and/or the more you know their location, the less you know their
velocity)

In order for electrons to 'orbit', the electrons must know their own
location and their own velocity, otherwise they can not follow the path of
an orbit, but they can not. Therefore they do not orbit.


Science fiction destroying the rule that ONLY when electrons change
******velocity****** (only when they accelerate or decelerate) do
photons radiate.
Thus velocity = orbit.

They ain't static. If they aint static they got an orbit and quantum
shells.





---------------------------------------

But from what you wrote above it's saying only possible to know the
PROBABILITY of their location....this is conflicting from the
definition I wrote above??

Follow the reference given. Listen to the lectures.

--
bz

please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.

bz+...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Bohrs Atom still number one
    ... is that 'not even the electrons know ... their velocity ....and vice-versa? ... Therefore they do not orbit. ... If you are trying to change others opinions, you are going at it wrong ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • 2. General Relativitys & Spacetimes TRUE MODEL
    ... In an electric circuit with a battery, the electrons move in a circuit ... are regarded as mass in the Spacetime model...therefore: ... Protons do not COMPLY with the present spacetime model ... since Two Protons will never orbit each other (Yet protons are mass ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Bohrs Atom still number one
    ... their velocity ....and vice-versa? ... In order for electrons to 'orbit', the electrons must know their own ... If you are trying to change others opinions, you are going at it wrong ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Since k varies but not G suggests an Eather
    ... The charges are not fixed in space, ... protons don't orbit each other (because in another post you said they ... Do you have any evidence or links that electrons don't orbit ... orbitals, and even by looking at the pictures of them I still don't ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: "archaic" view of atom structure
    ... states of atoms. ... > electrons, some electrons are forced into larger circular orbits, and ... It has no "orbit" at all! ... > nucleus as it travels around it (we all learned in elementary school ...
    (sci.physics)