Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: "guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx" <guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 May 2007 21:52:41 -0700
On May 9, 12:50 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 8, 11:45 pm, "g...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:??
On May 7, 6:07 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 7, 2:10 pm, "g...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The point being you gave an incorrect comparison....the cyclotron
accelerates the electron(= electron has higher and higher velocity as
it travels in the cyclotron/magnetron) but the electron does not
accelerate(= constant velocity) around a nucleus if it is traveling in
a perfect circle.
That is incorrect. Electrons will radiate while *coasting* around an
accelerator ring at constant velocity.
But the significant difference is that electrons do not go in a ring
around the nucleus. They don't go in a circle around the nucleus at
all. This is precisely the problem with the Bohr model. If they did go
around in a circle, they would have to radiate.
PD
The cyclotron's field(s) are in the linear path of the electron
instead of a constant nucleur centre.
That's not so. If it were true, the electron would proceed in a
straight line rather than bending in a circle.
Like a TV tube, the magnetic lines of force around the ring in the
cyclotron instead of ONLY in the center of the cyclotron.
These magnetic lines of force are directly in the approaching path of
the electron.
Does anyone dispute that electrons shed photons to get closer to a
nucleus?
Actually, they shed photons to get to a lower energy state. That is
closer to the nucleus in Bohr's model, but not necessarily in reality.
See a freshman chemistry text.
I did, and from what I found a lower energy state is closer to the
nucleus...I found nothing else.
http://www.physics.utoledo.edu/~lsa/_color/06_atoms.htm
quote: "Emission occurs when the electron falls from an excited state
to a lower energy state closer to the nucleus."
Does anyone dispute only "x" amount of electrons can be found at any
one time around a nucleus?
The three above are the answer.- Hide quoted text -
As before, the three above are the answers
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: PD
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: bz
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- References:
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: bz
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: bz
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: bz
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: bz
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: bz
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: bz
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: PD
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: PD
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- Prev by Date: Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
- Next by Date: Re: V^2 = V1 x V2 anyone know his geometry??
- Previous by thread: Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- Next by thread: Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|