Re: Evidence against emission theories
- From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 May 2007 22:40:46 -0700
Androcles wrote:
"Tom Roberts" <tjroberts137@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:j_n0i.2988$RX.1923@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Pentcho Valev wrote:
What matters Roberts Roberts is that the speed of light is c'=c+v in
the absence of a gravitational field
That does not "matter" at all, because it is known to be wrong.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Sagnac/Sagnac.htm
The troll Humpty Roberts is displaying his incredible ignorance once again.
Dishonesty, not ignorance, is displayed in this particular case:
Tom Roberts wrote:
Pentcho Valev wrote:
What matters Roberts Roberts is that the speed of light is c'=c+v in
the absence of a gravitational field
That does not "matter" at all, because it is known to be wrong. There
are numerous experiments with moving sources or mirrors that demonstrate
it is wrong. Several of them have no optical extinction to cloud the issue.
c'=c(1+V/c2)
in the presence of a gravitational field.
This, too, is wrong, as has been explained many times.
Only Tom Roberts and Paul Andersen (the latter just parrots the
former) claim Einstein's 1911 equation c'=c(1+V/c^2) is wrong. It has
been explained many times by many clever relativists why Einstein's
1911 equation c'=c(1+V/c^2) is correct.
Pentcho Valev
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- From: Androcles
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- References:
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- From: ca314159
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- From: bz
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- From: Pentcho Valev
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- From: Androcles
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- Prev by Date: Re: Comment on GR & Mach
- Next by Date: Re: Are these people insane? Seriously.
- Previous by thread: Re: Evidence against emission theories
- Next by thread: Re: Evidence against emission theories
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|