Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity

On May 10, 5:28 am, v...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 9 mayo, 22:53, karandash2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:



On May 9, 6:36 pm, v...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On 4 mayo, 16:55, karandash2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On May 2, 5:09 am, v...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
<Raphaelshito's cretinisms snipped>

Your misunderstanding among the "E" I used in my first post and the
potential energies E_0 and E_1 used by Einstein is explained in
another post of this thread.

RVHG (Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato)- Hide quoted text -

Listen , old fart

The paper has only a handful of very simple equations, ok? So, even a
freshman can understand them.
I understand that you went to school in Cuba but I thought that the
commies had a pretty good education system. Are you home schooled?
See, H and E have the same meaning, TOTAL ENERGY.
So, when Einstein calculates H0-E0 and H1-E1 , these differences have
the meaning of kinetic energy K0,1. No mention of any potential
energy, fartso. How many days before your pension for this month
arrives?

See my answer in all detail in another part of this thread ( a little
up).

RVHG(Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato)

Bye , old fart. Go back to counting the days before pension check
arrives.- Ocultar texto de la cita -

- Mostrar texto de la cita -

I am not sure now if you found my last post in the other part of the
thread. I will repeat here the essential part of it. My words between
[ ], your words between { }.

[What kind of energy are E_0 and E_1 in the formulas H_0 - E_0=K_0+C
and H_1 - E_1=K_1+C that appears in Einstein's paper?]

Obviously, TOTAL energy before and after gama emission as viewed from
frames
S0 and S1, persistent cretin. No mention of ANY potential energy, old
unemployed fart.
<rest of Raphaelshito repeated cretinisms snipped>

.

Quantcast