Re: Bohr's Atom still number one

On May 10, 3:28 am, bz <bz+...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[...]

Guskz is not interested in learning. I thought that had been made
clear nearly a month ago?

He will think of a bunch of questions and ideas that, at the surface,
sound interesting but he is totally uninterested in doing even the
smallest bit of legwork in order to get resolution.

He posts here to sound smart, and that's it. Don't encourage his
stupidity.

.