Re: the moon surface is soft
- From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 May 2007 00:20:38 -0700
On May 10, 10:07 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 10, 11:52 am, EricGisse<jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 10, 11:46 am, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 7, 3:55 pm, bataneros <d...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
according to relativity gringos put gringos onmoon, but
where are the strongest evidences
The moon's surface, other than obvious protruding rock, is tens of
meters deep in extremely soft (lightly compacted) and bone dry soil
that's actually still more than a touch salty.
Walking on that dusty surface is not an option unless wearing over-
sized snowshoes, plus having a really good anti-static solution or
applied technology.
Don't bother looking to those Kodak moments for any NASA/Apollo
supportive evidence because, it just isn't there to behold.
How do you know, if there is no evidence?
Did the aliens tell you,Brad?
The problem is, there's simply too damn much evidence that supports my
side of this argument to pick from. You name it, and if it's of
something being used on behalf of NASA/Apollo its skewed if not
entirely bogus as Muslim WMD.
What "evidence"?
The only direct evidence of how the lunar surface behaves is from the
Apollo missions - which you think are fake.
Kodak, a good 3D solar system simulator and myself have all the
evidence that counts.
In addition to those pesky regular laws of physics, and of multiple
replicated science that's way over on my side of this argument,
whereas a 1/6th gravity worth of such a vacuum and solar forced bone
dry, highly reactive and unavoidably being an electrostatic
environment, as such isn't exactly capable of compacting squat,
resulting in that absolutely pathetic surface tension which simply
isn't going to clump as worthy of any other form of your infomercial
squat, that any of you silly folks have to offer.
.....yet somehow men walked on the moon anyway. Isn't that curious?
You're not just born-again liars, but far worse.
-
Brad Guth
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: the moon surface is soft
- From: BradGuth
- Re: the moon surface is soft
- References:
- the moon surface is soft
- From: bataneros
- Re: the moon surface is soft
- From: BradGuth
- Re: the moon surface is soft
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: the moon surface is soft
- From: BradGuth
- the moon surface is soft
- Prev by Date: What is the wavefunction of an electron near the neutron star?
- Next by Date: Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- Previous by thread: Re: the moon surface is soft
- Next by thread: Re: the moon surface is soft
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|