Re: the moon surface is soft

On May 11, 12:20 am, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 10, 10:07 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On May 10, 11:52 am, EricGisse<jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On May 10, 11:46 am, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On May 7, 3:55 pm, bataneros <d...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

according to relativity gringos put gringos onmoon, but
where are the strongest evidences

The moon's surface, other than obvious protruding rock, is tens of
meters deep in extremely soft (lightly compacted) and bone dry soil
that's actually still more than a touch salty.

Walking on that dusty surface is not an option unless wearing over-
sized snowshoes, plus having a really good anti-static solution or
applied technology.

Don't bother looking to those Kodak moments for any NASA/Apollo
supportive evidence because, it just isn't there to behold.

How do you know, if there is no evidence?

Did the aliens tell you,Brad?

The problem is, there's simply too damn much evidence that supports my
side of this argument to pick from. You name it, and if it's of
something being used on behalf of NASA/Apollo its skewed if not
entirely bogus as Muslim WMD.

What "evidence"?

The only direct evidence of how the lunar surface behaves is from the
Apollo missions - which you think are fake.

Although it would have been nice having direct interactive science
instruments on deck (which should have been easily accomplished if
we'd actually walked on that sucker), though otherwise the best
available remote science of our moon is more than good enough to
suggest upon multiple other reasons for Earth having obtained that
moon.

Most folks here in Usenet naysay land, that are summarily stuck
forever with their one and only NASA/Apollo koran version of the
truth, are as such entirely unable to even consider upon any other
viable alternatives. That's rather unfortunate that so much of
otherwise good talent and resources must be continually wasted, along
with such spendy decades upon decades blown for good.

Much of our salty old moon's surface has in fact become soft. Though
much of that moon's dusty surface is protruded by basalt, it has
obviously since been impacted and/or having collected everything
including the cosmic kitchen sink. In addition to it's significant
gravity, it's also highly electrostatic charged and thus far better
off at having attracted and otherwise retained most of the solar and
cosmic flak that comes along, as certainly a whole lot better off at
keeping its nasty stuff than anything our wussy magnetosphere manages
to retain.

Unfortunately, icy proto-moons are still being officially topic/author
banished, as being as taboo/nondisclosure as is the truth about Iraq
and a good dozen other matters. Even a simple topic of "What if
(Craters)" by G=EMC^2 Glazier gets the usual mainstream status quo
flak treatment, as a insurmountable gauntlet that's contributed by
those Old Testament fools trying their faith-based level best at
keeping the rest of us village idiots as snookered and/or as
dumbfounded as possible, and for the most part it has been working.

Folks here in this well orchestrated anti-think-tank Usenet of naysay
land, as such really haven't allowed us to seriously look at those
moon craters with any open mindset, whereas most of which are truly
massive yet unusually shallow craters within those larger and even
shallower craters, with much less their ever having associated any
potential of ice as having once upon a time covered that big old salty
sucker (I'm thinking to the tune of 262 km).

Of the most recent craters being 10 fold deeper by ratio to their
diameter means there was at that more recent time little if any ice on
deck. Though I'd have to agree that a great amount of common moon
dust by way of primary and secondary impact shards, plus local and
cosmic dust has contributed to filling in the vast majority of those
older craters, to the tune of such nasty composition being tens of
meters deep in the most fluffy of dry and uncompacted dark/sooty (aka
coal pit) looking stuff you can imagine. I often think of our moon as
being a cosmic morgue, especially since nothing gets burned up prior
to impact.

You folks must realize that Sedna is a worthy icy proto-moon of
roughly 1500~1800 km, that's likely covered by as much as 500 km of
that dirty reddish and most likely salty ice. In fact, most anything
Oort cloud or even Kuiper belt worthy is going to be and/or shortly
become icy. For example, I can imagine the big rock and/or whatever's
the core of such a hard under-surface of Sedna being that of almost no
craters, as due to itself having been so nicely ice protected.

For benefit of further argument; If such an icy proto-moon were
moving along from Sirius to Sol, say if that interstellar trek had
been taking at most a few tens of thousands of years (say incoming at
40 km/s), I wonder how much extra ice and snow build-up (in addition
to whatever it originally had) one might expect to obtain while
exiting away from the read-giant pushing realm of Sirius and obviously
entering through our icy Oort cloud?

You'd think this kind of planetology and cosmology research, as based
entirely upon the regular laws of physics, would become another one of
those nifty 3D simulation applications for a good supercomputer, don't
you think. Especially since most other moons and perhaps even a few
planets of this solar system seem as though having arrived after the
initial creation of our Sol and whatever local planets. In fact,
there's no good reasoning to perceive that Earth was born of the very
same exact stuff as Sol.
-
Brad Guth

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: On the Subject of Ice
    ... The quoted passage below, from a NASA website, explains how ice exists ... "The Moon has no atmosphere, any substance on the lunar surface is ... shadowed areas do exist in the bottom of deep craters near the Moon's ...
    (sci.space.shuttle)
  • Life on the moon
    ... craters on the moon where ice is also found. ... This type of carbon growth may also occur on northern and craters on the ... These carbon growths are universal and occour everywhere there is an energy ...
    (sci.astro.seti)
  • Re: Next Space Station: 7.35e22 kg at Earths L1
    ... Without our moon, over sufficient time Earth would soon enough become ... pesky moon until after the very last ice age this planet w/moon will ... moon craters with any open mindset, whereas most of which are truly ...
    (sci.space.station)
  • Re: Life on the moon
    ... managed such interstellar transports of sufficient ice and life within ... moon has clearly been hosting an assortment of somewhat unusually large ... craters, many of which measure greater than 1000 km, with one extremely ... through space and into Earth's atmosphere, ...
    (sci.astro.seti)
  • Re: So how can we afford that ?
    ... method of "so what's the difference" worth of artificial inflation via ... Since most anything about our moon and especially if pertaining Venus, ... Megatonnes of moon rock resides upon Earth; ... Of course there's been absolute loads of smaller than 100 km craters ...
    (sci.space.policy)