Re: Potential energy in Einstein's 1905 Relativity

On May 11, 7:51 pm, v...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
<Raphaelshito long drwan imbecilities snipped>

Einstein doesn't use the word TOTAL in his paper, but by the historic
context we can deduce that when he writes "energy of the body" he is
referring to its total energy.

You are finally learning, old fart.

In a similar way Einstein doesn't use
the word POTENTIAL, but by the historic context we can deduce that
when he writes "energy of the body at rest"

But he never writes "energy of the body at rest" , you must have a
cubanese translation (or is it the soviet one?) .
He refers to the body being at rest in one frame, old fart, that's
all. The "body" has just emitted some gama rays in the frame of rest,
old unemployable imbecile, so it has energy. And it isn't potential,
pathetic historic fraudster.

<rest of Raphaelshito's cretinsisms mercifully snipped>

.

Quantcast