Re: "Some" people are drunk with Uncertainty Principle
- From: "guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx" <guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 May 2007 15:06:05 -0700
On May 11, 2:08 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 10, 11:54 pm, "g...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Some" people are drunk with the Uncertainty Principal.....so far as
giving the electron MYSTICAL (non-motion) behavior inside the Atom.
The only allocation "permitted" to the Uncertainty Principle is that
the Uncertainty arises from waves(electron and/or photon) INTERFERING
(thus the Uncertainty) with other waves (electron) as demonstrated by
the double slit-experiment.
OTHERWISE it would be ****impossible*** to control where the electron
HITS the phosphorous screen inside the TV tube.
Yes timing (not uncertain) and location (not uncertain) of the
electron is ALWAYS known inside the TV tube otherwise the picture
couldn't be drawn.
*******************************************
But***** those mystical peole will continue arguying (as I just said
the ONLY reason it's Uncertain is because of WAVE INTERFERENCE).
So they'll just keep arguying even in this post until they get a
college diploma to understand the full meaning of the word "ONLY" (I
ain't exagerating).
You make the same mistake that is often made by novices on this
subject.
Speaking of novice, you do not believe they know exactly where Mister
electron is when they generate a TV picture.
The electron itself is the TV picture, and they know exactly it's
location and velocity when it hits the phosphorous screen (both during
the horiztontal sweeping motion and the vertical refresh rate).
MYSTICAL. (It's momentum = it's intensity on the screen, it's location
is the location on the screen during it's sweeping motion)
Now a novice would say...ok but not when it's traveling inside the TV
tube...again wrong. Magnetics control it's HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL
postion all along the way and it needs to be dead accurate.
MYSTICAL
If Heizenbaby used magnetics and stopped even half way before the
electron reached the single slit...then it would the electron would
always hit at the same location (and not random).
Even for double slits...if you place a light bulb after the double
slits then the electron would still behave like a particle(a bullet)
and always hit (using magnets mentionned above prior to the slits) at
the same location.
Considering there is E and/or M fields about the electron, it may
even be these fields generating the wavelike interence pattern and not
the electron itself (which are then nullified by the photon EM fields
from the light bulb mentionned above).
The uncertainty principle gives a certain minimum value to the
*product* of uncertainties of two dynamical variables associated with
an object.
It does NOT say that the values of those dynamical variables are
completely unknown.
PD- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- "Some" people are drunk with Uncertainty Principle
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: "Some" people are drunk with Uncertainty Principle
- From: PD
- "Some" people are drunk with Uncertainty Principle
- Prev by Date: Re: More on the controversy about the Schwarzschild radius and black holes.
- Next by Date: Re: Eric Gisse insists Temperature is Not a Tensor!
- Previous by thread: Re: "Some" people are drunk with Uncertainty Principle
- Next by thread: Re: "Some" people are drunk with Uncertainty Principle
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
