Re: Let us be sure that we know what the problem is!
- From: Shubee <e.shubee@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 May 2007 20:15:34 -0700
On May 15, 7:38 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 15, 7:16 pm, Shubee <e.shu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 15, 6:25 pm, "Bill Hobba" <rubb...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Wrong - once you take accelerations into account, ...
Bill
You are misrepresenting the stupidity of popular SR.
So what's wrong with SR, Shooby?
Be sure to explain what is wrong with SR while explaining how
obtaining the _exact same thing_ in your paper avoids what is wrong
with SR.
Unlike Einstein and his cult followers, I don't presuppose the
nonexistence of an absolute frame of reference. Unlike LET, I don't
presuppose the existence of an absolute frame of reference. I derive
the Lorentz transformation without those unnecessary assumptions. I
then show that spacetime models exist that are governed by the Lorentz
transformation equations where an absolute frame of reference exists.
I also admit the observation that no spacetime model exists which
represents Einsteinian SR. For instance, note the existence of the
distinguished, unique observer in Minkowski diagrams. He gets an
orthogonal coordinate system. All other observers get different kinds
of oblique coordinates.
http://www.etsu.edu/math/gardner/5310/5310pdf/dg2-8.pdf
Consider the meaning of my thread titled, Constructibility and
Mathematical Existence. I posit that Einstein SR has no mathematical
existence in the Hilbert atlas of all conceivable universes.
Shubee
http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/special.pdf
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Let us be sure that we know what the problem is!
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Let us be sure that we know what the problem is!
- References:
- Let us be sure that we know what the problem is!
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Let us be sure that we know what the problem is!
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: Let us be sure that we know what the problem is!
- From: Shubee
- Re: Let us be sure that we know what the problem is!
- From: Eric Gisse
- Let us be sure that we know what the problem is!
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about the velocity addition
- Next by Date: Re: Question about the velocity addition
- Previous by thread: Re: Let us be sure that we know what the problem is!
- Next by thread: Re: Let us be sure that we know what the problem is!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|