Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: "guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx" <guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 16 May 2007 02:27:59 -0700
On May 11, 9:23 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 10, 11:05 pm, "g...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
An electron only experiences a force due to a field where it's at. It
doesn't feel a field where it's not.
An electron away from a nucleus feels the field at the spot away from
the nucleus, not at the nucleus.
Wheter electric magnets or non-electric magnets...there are more than
one and the electron feels the field of all even those more distant
then others.
That is incorrect. You may want to read up in an introductory physics
text about fields.
introductory
Any particle that is sensitive to a field experiences a force that is
proportional to the field *at the location* of the particle and that
location only. That is, in fact, the *definition* of a field.
introductory = basics and basics = F of field weakens by 1/r^2 or 1/
r^3
therefore an electron with two magnets, one at r1 and the other at r2
would not feel only the force of only the closest magnet but the
farther one as well even though its value is weakened by 1/r^2 (or 1/
r^3) and if you add quintuple magnets then the value of the closest
magnet has less even more less effect on the electron.
Neutral charges does not mean neutral fields.
Please hit your reset button and start again.
PD
.
- References:
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: bz
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: bz
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: bz
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: bz
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: PD
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: PD
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: PD
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- From: PD
- Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- Prev by Date: God discourse and Physics, Math and the Model.
- Next by Date: Re: Diffraction Gratings Prove SR Wrong.
- Previous by thread: Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- Next by thread: Re: Bohr's Atom still number one
- Index(es):