Re: Newbie question about gravity
- From: "Bill Hobba" <rubbish@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 01:49:46 GMT
"Phil" <cms_pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1179756240.252327.203940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On May 20, 9:59 pm, "Bill Hobba" <rubb...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Martin Hogbin" <goatREMOVETHIS...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:VpWdnZIPX6qFFM3bnZ2dnUVZ8sylnZ2d@xxxxxxxxx
"z" <genesinpie...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1179681079.907737.280680@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
With my superficial grasp of spacetime physics I have come to a basic
understanding of such complex and occasionally bizarre gravitational
phenomena as orbital pathways, light bending, and black holes, but
there remains one simple every day fact of gravity that does not make
sense to me within this framework: why do things fall down?
If I drop a baseball, what gives it its downward motion? I understand
how the curvature of spacetime affects the trajectories of objects
that are already moving, but if an object is initially at rest, how
does the curvature of space time make any difference?
Remember, it is spaceTIME that is curved. You are always
travelling (if that is the right word) throught time. When spacetime
is curved by matter or energy, your 'motion' through time
causes you to move through space.
It's kind of ironic. The same concept can be said of real
accelerations. In other words, when your time path is curved by
acceleration, your motion through time causes you to move through
space. The treatment of gravity in GTR seems to resemble more of a
"acceleration by virtue of inertia" theory rather than purely an
inertial theory of gravity.
Just to expand a bit on what Martin said, when gravity is weak the
curvature
of space is negligible - it is the curvature of time that results in
motion.
I posted the exact mathematical detail a while ago (a variant of one
found
in Landau - Classical Theory of Fields) - if you are interested I can
dig
it up from google - but the derivation can be found in any good book on
relativity.
I would appreciate a link to your google article.
See:
http://groups.google.com.au/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/76b3c07276effdd4
For clarification,
I take it that "space curvature" is what we commonly consider as tidal
accelerations, a differential of acceleration over a spatial
interval.
It is space-time that is curved. Now if the space-time curvature is small
(ie the terms of the metric are approximately Lorentzian) the math shows
(due to how large the speed of light is) the curvature of the space part is
much smaller again. By this is meant the spatial part of the metric can be
taken as Euclidian with very good accuracy.
But the time curvature, is the curvature which determines
the geodesics of point masses. Time curvature definitely causes
relative accelerations of local freely-falling frames which swamp any
tidal effects, meaning that, their coordinate systems are relatively
accelerated (dv/dt) wrt to one another even though they are moving
inertially. Spacetime Physics only addresses the space curvature
(tidal property of curvature)
Huh? Space-time by definition mixes space and time into one.
Thanks
Bill
for the purpose of defining an adequate
domain for applying STR. So I would definitely appreciate a link.
I suspect time curvature is dimensionally similar to the space
curvature, acceleration/distance, only distance is in time as opposed
to three space? In any event, thanks for any help.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Newbie question about gravity
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: Newbie question about gravity
- References:
- Newbie question about gravity
- From: z
- Re: Newbie question about gravity
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: Newbie question about gravity
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: Newbie question about gravity
- From: Phil
- Newbie question about gravity
- Prev by Date: Re: Why Relativity Proves The BaTh Correct.
- Next by Date: Re: Why Relativity Proves The BaTh Correct.
- Previous by thread: Re: Newbie question about gravity
- Next by thread: Re: Newbie question about gravity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|