The real paradoxes in SR.

The real paradoxes in SR.

SR is itself a paradox. In fact, SR is full of
paradoxes. These are real paradoxes, not just
imagined paradoxes.
SR requires the speed of light to be c relative
to every frame. Such a requirement is physically
impossible. If there are relative motions between
frames, then in general, the relative velocity to a
specific photon cannot physically be the same in all
these frames.
What can be said is what LET says, in that the
measurement can all be the same, if the tools being
used to make these measurements are somehow all
different in every frame. So there are no paradoxes
in LET. But SR is completely impossible.

In SR, one is required to accept physical objects
doing things that physical objects just cannot do.
No two clocks can each be going slower than the other
all at the very same time. This is so funny that
even children laugh when they hear such things.
Thus, any thinking person knows that SR is not
complete. It is missing some very vital facts
somewhere. And if no one can give an explanation to
all these impossible things, then we will have to
reject SR.
SR is the most stupid theory that has ever
existed. It requires impossible things, and it does
all this with zero explanations.
No thinking person can be satisfied with SR. In
the past, some SR experts say that there are no
paradoxes in SR. Some of these experts think that if
SR provides a correct answer, then the providing of a
correct answer proves that there were no paradoxes.
But this is not correct. No matter how correct the
final answer might be, if in getting to this correct
answer, things had to do things that were physically
impossible makes SR even worse of a theory. You
never know just where SR is right or wrong.
Yes, you people are all sick if you believe in
SR. SR requires people to even believe that a photon
has no mass. What a sick thing it is, to force
people to say that a photon has no mass. The reason
you have to be stupid and say such things is because
SR is stupid, and has no explanation capabilities at
all. It is really bad. And anyone who supports this
theory as a good theory has no abilities to think.
No theory can be as strange and as impossible as SR.
It simply stinks.
You experts all talk about how special SR is
because of its symmetry. Yet, at almost all times
when you have to actually work out a problem, guess
what happens? You have to constantly be saying that
the symmetry was broken! You have to say the
symmetry was broken here, and it was broken there.
You have to say it was the acceleration that broke it
here, and it was the change in frames that broke it
there. There is no end to your breaks in symmetry.

So listen good: A theory either has symmetry or
it does not have symmetry. You cannot have it both
ways. If you have symmetry, then you do not have any
breaks in symmetry. If you have breaks in symmetry,
then your theory does not have symmetry.
I think that we are through with the lies that
are contained in SR. I sure know that I am through
will all these lies. And a scientific study of LET
will show you what a good theory can do for your self
respect, and it can give you a good feeling that you
should have if you really have a good theory.


Thanks for reading.
Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx>
Remove ... for e-mail.

.