Re: How scientific are SR experts?
- From: Phil <cms_pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 May 2007 14:22:30 -0700
On May 26, 10:36 am, "Gerald L. O'Barr" <glob...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
O'Barr comments: How scientific are SR experts?
This certainly is not physically possible. It
violates all concepts of causes and effects. Anyone
who places themselves into a fast moving frame has to
expend a great deal of energy into the motions they
need to enter that frame. And then after doing this,
after spending all this energy into entering into
these fast moving frames, they find no change (they
find zero change) . . .
Gerald,
What is with the sudden proliferation of posts? By the way the above
statement is false. There is a change in the relative energy of light
whan on is accelerated. After acceleration, the displacement in your
coordinate system remains the same. So yes, light of gamma wavelength
moves at no greater speed than light of orange wavelength in the
visible spectrum. So depending on which direction you are looking,
you will see blue-shifted or red shifted light. And by the way, that
is consistent with LET.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How scientific are SR experts?
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: How scientific are SR experts?
- References:
- How scientific are SR experts?
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- How scientific are SR experts?
- Prev by Date: Re: How scientific are SR experts?
- Next by Date: Re: The real paradoxes in SR.
- Previous by thread: Re: How scientific are SR experts?
- Next by thread: Re: How scientific are SR experts?
- Index(es):