O'Barr rejects SR for physical reasons.

O'Barr rejects SR for physical reasons.


In free space, let us take two objects, A and B,
confined upon a common inertial line. One object,
object A, will be fixed in its motion, with no
changes allowed in its state of motion. The other
object, object B, is under our full control. Let us
say that we have put together great stores of energy
to make it possible for us to place this object,
object B, into a multitude of different inertial
frames. This is just another way of saying that we
are going to change the velocity of object B.
Now between any two objects, there has to be a
relative velocity between them. But just suppose
that in accelerating this object B to different
velocities, we saw no change in its relative velocity
with respect to the fixed moving object, object A.
What if we accelerated this one object just as fast
as we can, or we slowed it down just as much as we
can, or even changed its direction, no matter what we
did, we still could not change the relative velocity
between these two objects! What would any thinking
person think?

Any thinking person would know that if you had two
objects with a relative velocity of v between them,
and then you changed the velocity of only one of
these two, and this act did not change their relative
velocity, they would instantly know that something
was physically in error. Under the conditions we
have stated, you cannot take two objects with a known
relative velocity between them, and not affect this
relative velocity if you force changes in velocity to
occur in any one of the two objects. Such a thing
would not be physically possible. It would do
violation to our basic understanding of all
relationships in basic kinetics. It would violate
our concepts of causes and effects.
So what would a reasonable person do, if such a
thing occurred? No one would accept such a result
without clear and unmistakable explanations being
presented.
Well, SR, right in its most basic assumptions,
tells us that the relative velocity between any free
moving photon with all inertial frames, no matter
what velocity they might individually be moving, is
c. No matter how fast or how slow you go, you are
still going to only measure c with respect to a
photon. You cannot cause your relative velocity
between yourself and any photon to change. And this
is definitely a physically impossible situation. SR
is physically impossible right from the start.
Let us take the paradox of the twins, A being the
stay at home twin, and twin B being the one to got to
a distant star and return. Twin A measures twin B's
clocks to go slow. Twin B measures twin A's clocks
to run slow. Both of these frames are valid SR
frames making valid SR measurements. Thus both of
these measurements have to be just as real as the
other. Yet physically, what they measure cannot both
be physically correct. And in the end, when they
meet up, we come to learn that one of these
measurements were not really real. They were real
only in a mathematical sense. But physically, they
could not have been and they were not physically
real. There was really a physical difference
occurring between the clocks of these two twins, and
this was established by the actual results.

Those of you who believe in SR measurements have
deluded yourselves. There is nothing wrong with
believing that SR tells you correctly what you will
measure. Your error is in always believing that the
measurements themselves are what are physically
occurring.
If you say you believe that what SR measures is
what is really physically occurring then you believe
things that are physically impossible. And no sane
person can believe in such a situation unless there
are clear and justifiable explanations. And do you
know something, there is not one single evidence to
justify your acceptance of such a silly and
physically impossible situation.

Yes, we do measure such things. But these
measurements are all made with tools such as clocks
and rulers. And we today know for sure that these
clocks can change with their motions. And if clocks
change, then so must rulers. And if our tools are
changeable tools, then they cannot make true or
correct measurement. This lack of change in relative
velocity between us and photons is due to these
simple acts of changes in the tools being used. So
we have our explanations. And these explanations are
not found in SR.

Today, we have reached a point of certainty that
there really are real changes in our tools.
Everyday, with satellite systems, we know that our
clocks are really changing with their motions. We
know these things for sure. And thus, we cannot stay
with SR, which is the weakest theory that has ever
existed. We must insist on having an explanation.
And the only reasonable and doable explanation is in
LET.

Thanks for reading.
Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx>

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Time dilation
    ... > The relative velocity is what causes the time dilation. ... It is the twin with the spacetime path that is curved, ... that the curved path has shorter elapsed time, ... Geodesics will be curves of maximal proper time from event A to B. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: OBarr rejects SR for physical reasons.
    ... we saw no change in its relative velocity ... stay at home twin, and twin B being the one to got to ... Twin B measures twin A's clocks ... frames making valid SR measurements. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: OBarr rejects SR for physical reasons.
    ... Your reasons for rejecting relativity have nothing to do with whatever ... we saw no change in its relative velocity ... stay at home twin, and twin B being the one to got to ... frames making valid SR measurements. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Time dilation
    ... >> Otherwise doesn't time dilation have to be based on more than just relative ... > Earth and the astronaut twin during the trip. ... Gee, that sounds utterly stupid. ... > So the relative velocity factor must include more than just the term ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Variation of Twins Problem
    ... They set both of their clocks to zero at ... their relative velocity is V=0. ... the traveling twin changes his velocity instantaneously from +v to -v as ... reference frame to another, the reading on his stay-at-home twin's clock ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast