Re: Is spacetime curvature the source of inertia?

"Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:1180560907.524487.211310
@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:

Both the Levi-Civita connection and Mach's priniciple are discussed
without conflict in the ~1923 lecture. I would want to see some
later references where he abandons Mach's principle because
his argument favoring it is quite persuasive.


http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/einstein-philscience/

[quote]
That Einstein later repudiated positivism is beyond doubt. Many remarks
from at least the early 1920s through the end of his life make this clear.
In 1946 he explained what he took to be Mach's basic error:
He did not place in the correct light the essentially constructive and
speculative nature of all thinking and more especially of scientific
thinking; in consequence, he condemned theory precisely at those points
where its constructive-speculative character comes to light unmistakably,
such as in the kinetic theory of atoms. (Einstein 1946, 21)

Is Einstein here also criticizing his own youthful philosophical
indiscretions? The very example that Einstein gives here makes any such
interpretation highly implausible, because one of Einstein's main goals in
his early work on Brownian motion (Einstein 1905b) was precisely to prove
the reality of atoms, this in the face of the then famous skepticism of
thinkers like Mach and Wilhelm Ostwald:
My principal aim in this was to find facts that would guarantee as much as
possible the existence of atoms of definite size. . . . The agreement of
these considerations with experience together with Planck's determination
of the true molecular size from the law of radiation (for high
temperatures) convinced the skeptics, who were quite numerous at that time
(Ostwald, Mach), of the reality of atoms. (Einstein 1946, 45, 47)
[unquote]

Though I am not sure, from my quick skim, exactly which thoughts of Mach
are being reputiated.




--
bz

please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.

bz+spr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is spacetime curvature the source of inertia?
    ... later references where he abandons Mach's principle because ... That Einstein later repudiated positivism is beyond doubt. ... Though I am not sure, from my quick skim, exactly which thoughts of Mach ... Mach's principle is the name given by Einstein to a vague ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames
    ... experimentally demonstrating time dilation. ... >> clams the principle is incorrect does not know what they are talking ... > nature exist and the principle of general covariance could be applied, ... >> took Einstein to task on this very point. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames
    ... experimentally demonstrating time dilation. ... >> clams the principle is incorrect does not know what they are talking ... > nature exist and the principle of general covariance could be applied, ... >> took Einstein to task on this very point. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames
    ... experimentally demonstrating time dilation. ... >> clams the principle is incorrect does not know what they are talking ... > nature exist and the principle of general covariance could be applied, ... >> took Einstein to task on this very point. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Why
    ... You are using the term ``principle theory'' to ... Nowhere does einstein say that. ... >One may point to just such a process in our own physics. ... >relativity is a principle theory and does not attempt to answer those ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)