Re: Does element mass = # of electron + neucleons??
- From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 May 2007 18:52:18 -0700
On May 30, 5:10 pm, "Jeckyl" <n...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Eric Gisse" <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1180567390.812227.17360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On May 30, 4:16 pm, "Jeckyl" <n...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
Do electrons actually move within an atom .. of is the electron 'orbital'
just a 'cloud' of quantum probability ?
The orbital is where the electron will most probably be with a given
set of quantum numbers.
Yes .. but does an electron actually 'move'. in the 'classical' model,
electrons were little particles that orbited around a central nucleus like a
planet around a sun. But with quantum probability orbital 'clouds' is there
any 'movement' of the electron (assuming that actually has any meaning).
Yes the electron moves [nonzero expectation value of velocity], but it
does not move in a classical orbit.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does element mass = # of electron + neucleons??
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Does element mass = # of electron + neucleons??
- References:
- Does element mass = # of electron + neucleons??
- From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Does element mass = # of electron + neucleons??
- From: PD
- Re: Does element mass = # of electron + neucleons??
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Does element mass = # of electron + neucleons??
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Does element mass = # of electron + neucleons??
- From: Jeckyl
- Does element mass = # of electron + neucleons??
- Prev by Date: Re: Space,Time and Earth's Motion
- Next by Date: Re: Deriving the Lorentz Transformation Without Einstein's First o...
- Previous by thread: Re: Does element mass = # of electron + neucleons??
- Next by thread: Re: Does element mass = # of electron + neucleons??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
