Re: O'Barr: Math is not Physics.
- From: "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 May 2007 02:04:50 -0700
On May 31, 12:52 am, "Gerald L. O'Barr" <glob...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
O'Barr: Math is not Physics.
When an aeroplane pilot trusts intuition above instruments,
he is not flying... not for long anyway.
There isn't anything in physics or science in general
that is accepted absent rigourous mathmatics.
How SR experts think!
Let us consider these wild things that SR experts
say with no evidence and with no cause. We will do
this by using something that we know.
No... let's not leave to rumors and mind-melding, a survey
that would never end. We can acceess the theory directly.
You are offering no physical or mathematical
proof of a theory that can be concisely stated:
"The [ ] Incompatibility of the Law of Propagation of
Light with the Principle of Relativity [is only] Apparent"
http://www.bartleby.com/173/7.html
That is rigourously implemented in Time dependent
Maxwell's equations.
Can you show us the "correct" way to write equation 511 ?
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node50.html
The writers of the course material should be eternally grateful
to you for bringing the error to their attention.
Sue...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: O'Barr: Math is not Physics.
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: O'Barr: Math is not Physics.
- References:
- O'Barr: Math is not Physics.
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- O'Barr: Math is not Physics.
- Prev by Date: Re: Is spacetime curvature the source of inertia?
- Next by Date: Re: Space,Time and Earth's Motion
- Previous by thread: Re: O'Barr: Math is not Physics.
- Next by thread: Re: O'Barr: Math is not Physics.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|