Re: Evidence against emission theories
- From: "Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 23:07:42 +1000
"Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message
news:068t535smvgb91l4i1jkl5berqsa89dioc@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 31 May 2007 00:59:59 +0000 (UTC), bz <bz+spr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I am interested in seeing how your model handles all of these factors.No understand...
We all know you don't understand your own model .. that's obvious by the way
you divert and feign ignorance.
.
- References:
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- From: bz
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- From: Jeckyl
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- From: bz
- Re: Evidence against emission theories
- Prev by Date: Re: Evidence against emission theories
- Next by Date: Re: Is spacetime curvature the source of inertia?
- Previous by thread: Re: Evidence against emission theories
- Next by thread: Re: Evidence against emission theories
- Index(es):