Re: Space,Time and Earth's Motion
- From: manesiro <mansoormirzamurtuza2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 May 2007 07:50:15 -0700
On May 31, 6:58 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 31, 8:31 am, manesiro <mansoormirzamurtu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 31, 7:12 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 30, 8:51 pm, manesiro <mansoormirzamurtu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 30, 6:29 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 29, 7:31 pm, manesiro <mansoormirzamurtu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 30, 1:09 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 29, 9:46 am, manesiro <mansoormirzamurtu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The people get cheated by elaborate experiments and elaborate
mathematics.
I don't think so. There are expert people in place who protect people
like you from being cheated by elaborate experiments and elaborate
mathematics. You have your choice: either become an expert, or trust
the experts. It doesn't do much good to mistrust everyone -- that's
called paranoia.
Here is something very simple.
There is Infinite Space and Infinite Time.
Whoops. You probably need to back those statements up. Otherwise I'd
think you were trying to cheat me.
Why not giving comments on model of Clock presented by me instead of
commenting on introductory remarks? Got hurt because got cheated by
Modern Physics, Higher Mathematics and Nobel? Is this model not
explaining all Observational and experimental findings so far?
In physics, "explaining" means being able to calculate a measurable
quantity. You haven't done that, and so you haven't done any physics.
If you think this is unfair, or shouldn't be what "explaining" means
in physics, then so be it. It still isn't physics.
PD- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
No certificate is needed for it being Physics.
I disagree. Physics is what physicists say they do. A crystal-
worshiper can spend all day massaging his bit of quartz and muttering
that he is doing physics, but that doesn't make it physics.
Hold the clock and see
for yourself as described.This is a peculiar Cosmic arrangement for
Earth. Earth is peculiar in itself for holding life and mind. whether
this arrangement conforms to Reality or not is a question. How to test
it is another question.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Who is claiming to be Physicist. I simply gave a model to find out a
peculiar arrangement.
Instead of accepting this simple explanation you
are talking of Physics. I talk about Reality and how to test whether
this model corresponds to Reality or not.
Well, since you are not a physicist, and since what you are talking
about is not physics, then posting it to a physics discussion group is
inappropriate.
Perhaps you should post it to alt.reality.
The Reality may be simple and
a simple solution be True whereas century of experimentations and
mathematization may be false.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You can talk anything but you can not accept the obvious.There is
Reality and there is TRUTH. No division into Physics or Metaphysics.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Space,Time and Earth's Motion
- From: PD
- Re: Space,Time and Earth's Motion
- References:
- Space,Time and Earth's Motion
- From: manesiro
- Re: Space,Time and Earth's Motion
- From: PD
- Re: Space,Time and Earth's Motion
- From: manesiro
- Re: Space,Time and Earth's Motion
- From: PD
- Re: Space,Time and Earth's Motion
- From: manesiro
- Re: Space,Time and Earth's Motion
- From: PD
- Re: Space,Time and Earth's Motion
- From: manesiro
- Re: Space,Time and Earth's Motion
- From: PD
- Space,Time and Earth's Motion
- Prev by Date: Re: Is spacetime curvature the source of inertia?
- Next by Date: Re: O'Barr: What is the real velocity of light in Frame A?
- Previous by thread: Re: Space,Time and Earth's Motion
- Next by thread: Re: Space,Time and Earth's Motion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
