Re: Bilgy and Randy disagree with Tom Roberts

On May 30, 3:05 pm, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 30, 4:59 am, "g...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On May 30, 1:29 am, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On May 29, 3:20 pm, "g...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Tom Roberts(and me) says that higher Intensity means more photons in a
beam.

Bilge was incapable of reading it (as usual) and Randy said that is
incorrect.

Randy's words, QUOTE:"No, photon intensity does not mean "multiple
photons".

My words: "You have misunderstood what I said, you have misunderstood
what Tom said, you have misunderstood what you read, the article
you quoted agrees with Tom."

Don't you DARE use my name this way, you lying piece of slime.

- Randy

Both sentences above are exactly copy and pasted, please do not accuse
of lying or slime.

My last words in the other thread were to the effect that Roberts
is right and you are wrong.

I accuse you of lying when you use my name in a subject line
and imply I claimed you were right and Roberts was wrong,
directly opposite to what I said.

Well your words seem to be the EXACT OPPOSITE of Tom Roberts words.
Both your exact words and Tom's below here:


1. You're exact words, quote:"No, photon intensity does not mean
"multiple photons".

2. and Tom Roberts exact words, quote: "higher Intensity means
more(mutliple) photons in a beam".


To imply that someone with knowlege in Physics would know that they do
not conflict = incoherent babbling induced with pride and prejudice.


.

Relevant Pages