Re: A cry for help!


"Gerald L. O'Barr" <globarr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1180797243.874347.137450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
A cry for help!
How smart are SR experts?

Here we are, supposedly intelligent people, yet SR
experts do not even accept things that I know are
true. Why is that? Yes, their answers never show
that I am wrong, it is just a constant word game,
that I am wrong. Not even the real experts dare say
anything to support me. They keep quite most of the
time. When they think of some small way that allows
them to say I am wrong (maybe I misspelled a word
here or there), they will move and say I am wrong,
without saying why I am wrong, and then move on.

But let us look at the facts: We sit here on the
earth, and we, with the very best SR equipment that
we have, we look out over the things around us, and
we know, we measure, that the speed of light going
past everything we see that is moving, trains,
busses, the planets and the stars around us, we see
and we measure that the speed of light going past
everyone of these objects are seen and measured to be
something other than c. We do this! We measure
this! These are correct facts, correct SR facts.
And yet an SR expert will say, even thought we
know that there is not any moving object around us
that has light going by at c, that the light going
past us is going at exactly c. And it is going at
exactly c even though we ourselves are constantly
changing our velocity, even to velocities that had
just been existing in some of the objects around us
where we know it was not c. And all these
measurements are done with the exact same SR
equipment.

You need to understand that a clock second will have different duration
(different absolute time content) in different frames (different state of
absolute motion). Taking this into account, the speed of light can be a
constant math ratio c as measured by any observer with his clock second as
follows:
Light path length of ruler (299,792,458 m long physically)/the absolute time
(duration) content for a clock second co-moving with the ruler.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: 35% More CO2
    ... no means for such measurements, nor did anyone care what the ... all the guys who question the facts about global warming and the ... The entire herd of keyboard-tapping Googleists have really changed the tenor ... friend if you're honestly trying to uncover the facts. ...
    (rec.crafts.metalworking)
  • Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
    ... measurements of c since the late 1600s, ... standard, but some inherent uncertainties. ... Notice that the clock second was defined as "the duration of 9,192,631,770 ... The passage of a clock second in A's frame does not correspond to the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Reintroducing myself.
    ... expressing an opinion that differs from someone else's opinion, ... each person lives in his private world, with his own set of facts. ... I don't have an opinion on the complex measurements one ... whatever the cancer survival rates may be. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: The relationship between meter, speed of light and c
    ... measurements of c since the late 1600s, ... standard, but some inherent uncertainties. ... The meter started out as some fraction of the Earth's equatorial ... Notice that the clock second was defined as "the duration of 9,192,631,770 ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Fact
    ... Facts are sometimes interpreted and presented in different way by different ... > relative to the measuring apparatus. ... > measurements of speed are relative to the measuring apparatus, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)