Re: what is space-time?

There are an infinite approachable number of dimensions in
mathematics. The 11 dimensions in quantum physics is unobserved, so is
very likely science fiction. The 4d is also unobserved and is also
very likely fiction. All time has an observable and quantifiable
equivalent which is simply distance. Everything is existentially so
regardless of 'relativity'. Relativity is the physics of perception
not the physics of physical things.

As quantum physicists like to reduce all matter to energy, we can also
remember that no energy can be neither created or destroyed. If you
split an atom you release that energy. So, we know that energy to be
fact. Every atom on earth has always been here and time is irrelevant
since atoms are neither being created or destroyed. The Earth has not
changed its mass. Well, that is apart from the Hubble telescope and
other things leaving the earths orbit. The mass which your body is
made of has always been here (unless you believe in abracadabra).
Personally, I do not believe in abracadabra.

As the earth rotates and orbits the sun, the quicker you move from A
to B implies a shorter distance. i.e. like a snail trail that you
create across the solar system.

The solar system is the locale and rational for time on Earth. Time
itself is a model, developed because of the sense that we have a
stream of consciousness (we can only sense things in the place we are
not other places), as well as an observation of the day night
dichotomy. The clock simulates the orbit of earth relative to the sun.
This is a three dimensional world. If you see the 4th dimension,
you should start a Bene Gesserit breeding program.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bene_Gesserit

-y



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
    ... direction at moving from energy to rest mass smoothly along the same ... conversion frequency at which energy turns to matter because it ... "Understanding how to deal with dimensions is so important that the ... I really suggest you try to master the basics of physics. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... > and m are both equal to energy. ... Equations in physics are not "defined". ... Please tell us what the "true laws of mathematics" are. ... What on earth is that supposed to mean? ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... > and m are both equal to energy. ... Equations in physics are not "defined". ... Please tell us what the "true laws of mathematics" are. ... What on earth is that supposed to mean? ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... > and m are both equal to energy. ... Equations in physics are not "defined". ... Please tell us what the "true laws of mathematics" are. ... What on earth is that supposed to mean? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... > left hand side of the equation, then E cannot be the unit of joule. ... > merely an empty variable since a joule is a specific quantity of energy. ... What on earth do you mean with this sentence? ... >>The dimensions do agree when one chooses the units accordingly. ...
    (sci.physics.particle)