Re: O'Barr's comments on SR and LET.

"harry" <harald.vanlintelButNotThis@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1181114567_1781@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4665f901$0$1189$61c65585@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Gerald L. O'Barr" <globarr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1181056139.896191.315060@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
O'Barr's comments on SR and LET.

So .. please confirm

In LET, as you propose, does space and time remain simple 3D Euclidean
space and independent absolute time?

Does all matter physically get shorter (as well as the spaces between
matter) in the direction of travel, and do all clocks physically run
slower when we consider them moving relative to the absolute ether frame?

Is it as if you had adjusted the mechanisms of all clocks to make them
tick slower, and had put the matter in a vice to make it shorter?

I.e. as seen from the absolute ether frame is it a physical shortening
and slowing of clocks?

If so is it the ether that does this?

Or is the shortening and clock slowing that one would see from the ether
frame just an illusion somehow?

I had misunderstood you claims earlier I think (eg that not only did
clocks slow, but that their times got out of sync when moving) .. so
please confirm exactly what effects movement relative to the ether frame
has on matter and clocks AND on space and on time.

If you had read the references that I gave you,

I did

probably you would by now know the answers to your questions. Especially
your misunderstanding about SRT synchronization would have been cleared
up.

It is .. O"Barr's definition of what he sees as LET seemed to say only that
there was slowing of clocks, and not that there were sync issues.

So .. how do you address the mirror issue above? Why is it that the
incident and reflected angle are not correct?



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OBarrs comments on SR and LET.
    ... Does all matter physically get shorter (as well as the spaces between ... slower when we consider them moving relative to the absolute ether frame? ... Is it as if you had adjusted the mechanisms of all clocks to make them ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: OBarrs comments on SR and LET.
    ... Does all matter physically get shorter (as well as the spaces between ... when we consider them moving relative to the absolute ether frame? ... Is it as if you had adjusted the mechanisms of all clocks to make them tick ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: evidence for the existence of the ether
    ... It doesn't matter to the experiment. ... But electricity is not a ... No matter how we synchronize our clocks -- if we manage to do the ... But Lorentz did just fine without time dilation of moving clocks. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: An infinitely precise clock would run at a rate of zero seconds per second
    ... it's the clocks that run which are ... being contaminated by matter. ... that partial quantum Zeno effects cause time dilation. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: What should a theory give us?
    ... What's the matter with you?? ... there is "slowing of clocks"?! ... a combination of two, warm and moist, warm and dry, cold ... The slowing of clocks has been confirmed by measurements (notably Kennedy & ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)