Re: O'Barr's comments on SR and LET.
- From: Hayek <hayektt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 23:54:28 +0200
Gerald L. O'Barr wrote:
O'Barr's comments on SR and LET.
This is an important post. For some days now, I
have posted several articles on SR and LET. Let me
put some of these thoughts into one post.
[]
The solution is very simple : GR.
Consider the average mass distribution of the universe as the preferential reference frame. Then try to design an experiment that measures this. Try to see a clock as an inertiameter. If inertia varies, clock speed varies.
In this way, a clock at rest wrt to the average mass distribution of the surrounding universe will have the lowest inertia, and the highest clock speed. If you move wrt to this preferential reference frame, inertia increases and your clock speed decreases.
It might be possible to measure this with a half inertial-half quantum experiment. Certainty arises from inertia, uncertainty arises from the lack of inertia.
Uwe Hayek.
.
- References:
- O'Barr's comments on SR and LET.
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- O'Barr's comments on SR and LET.
- Prev by Date: Re: May The Force(s) Not be With Us
- Next by Date: Re: May The Force(s) Not be With Us
- Previous by thread: Re: O'Barr's comments on SR and LET.
- Next by thread: Re: O'Barr's comments on SR and LET.
- Index(es):