Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- From: Phil <cms_pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 21:03:53 -0700
On Jun 8, 5:41 pm, "Gerald L. O'Barr" <glob...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
O'Barr comments:
But we all now know that I was not trying to
say that we were obtaining the real length of
the train as it would be in the ether, I was only
saying that we had to have the true or correct
length of the moving train as measured in the
frame of the tracks.
So let me see if I get what you are saying. Are you saying that the
track frame observer needs to know the rest length of the train in
order to measure closing velocity of light relative to the train?
If so, that isn't the case. In the track frame one only needs to know
the velocity of the train and the velocity of the light. They simply
add +-c-+v. Knowing the rest length isn't necessary. And by the way,
SO WHAT? So according to the track frame the light can close on the
train faster than c or separate faster than c. Thats no big deal.
Light can close or separate slower than c according to the track
frame. That does not change the fact that lightspeed is c according
to coordinate systems of both frames.
And once more the track frame _is not_ special. I keep reminding you
of LET for one simple reason. No frame is special in it. All frames
are indistinguishable from the ether rest frame. Since any frame in
LET is equivalent to the ether rest frame the train frame is
equivalent to the track frame. End of story. Nothing is special
about the track frame.
Allow me to ask you for answer to the following gedanken.
Assume LET. You and I are in a spaceship which moves at .9c wrt the
ether rest frame. We haven't measured this velocity, it is given. So
our clocks are running alot slower than those resting in the ether
rest frame, right? Now you take a trip which first reduces your speed
so that you rest in the ether rest frame. Now you can spend as much
time resting in the ether rest frame as you like. Lets just assume
that you can live for many centuries. Stay as long as you wish
resting in the ether frame aging much faster than me. Then take the
trip back and meet me in the future.
Who will have aged more? Me in the space-ship moving at .9c wrt the
ERF or you who rested in the ERF for as long as you cared to?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- References:
- The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- From: Phil
- Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- Prev by Date: Re: SR WITHOUT THE LIGHT POSTULATE?
- Next by Date: Re: SR WITHOUT THE LIGHT POSTULATE?
- Previous by thread: Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- Next by thread: Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|