Re: THE PHYSICAL TRANSFORMATION EQUATIONS

On Jun 9, 4:50 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 8, 9:39 pm, Alen <a...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yes, I agree with that, and what I said doesn't deny it. What
I meant was that the dynamical reality doesn't make it clear
whether or not the static rotation model really exists. That is,
the dynamical reality also allows the possibility of some other
model. I have argued that another model is necessary because
I believe that it can be shown that the rotation model accepted
now for a century is not correct.

You have done no such thing.


Alen

Yes, I have: in my post, and in numerous other posts.

Alen


.

Loading