Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- From: "Jeckyl" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:42:57 +1000
"Gerald L. O'Barr" <globarr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1181615165.907057.129080@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: The velocity of light going pass a
moving train.
PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Gerald L. O'Barr" <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
. . .
O'Barr wrote:
O.K. Phil! What happened to your honesty? It
does not matter beans what anyone's feelings might
be. This is science. You tell me what is
simpler, a one-dimensional drawing or a two-
dimensional drawing? You tell me what is simpler,
a three dimensional theory, or a four dimensional
theory?
PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is disingenuous. Classical physics and LET
are 4 dimensional theories: 3 space dimensions and
1 time dimension. 3+1 = 4, not 3.
O'Barr comments:
Does P stand for Phil? I thought I was talking to
Phil!
PD, You forgot about temperature. Does this make
everything 5 dimensional?
Nonsense
Look, PD, this is not disingenuous. I did not ask
you, or him, or anyone, to respond. You have all
individually made the decision to act as if you
understood physics.
We do better than you, obviously
These comments about LET being
4-D is improper.
Don't you get it? .. ALL classic and LET physics involves the four
dimensions .. 3 of space and one of time.
And you should all pay for your
lack of understanding.
Oh .. give us a break .. who do you think you are?
Yes, in reality, there are a great number of
dimensions that can be considered and used. But when
SR experts say that SR is 4-D, they mean that time
can become space,
Yes .. in SR .. NOT in LET. Don't you even know your own theory?
and space can become time, by just
a simple rotation. They specifically say that there
is a 4-D spacetime continuum. And for this, they
will hang!
You are no expert in anything that we are
discussing. But you are better than most on this
net. I have every right in this world to make fun of
your mis-understanding of SR and LET. If you do not
like it, get someone to check what you say before you
post it.
Try that yourself .. you post so much crap its not funny.
.
- References:
- The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- From: Phil
- Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- From: Phil
- Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- From: Phil
- Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- From: Phil
- Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- From: PD
- Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- From: Gerald L. O'Barr
- The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- Prev by Date: Re: O'Barr: Modifications of SR have begun.
- Next by Date: Re: Synchrotron's radiation is from compressing and NOT bending the beam
- Previous by thread: Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- Next by thread: Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|