Re: The Mathematician.

On Jun 18, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@More-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
"Koobee Wublee" <koobee.wub...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Of course it is not the Lorentz transformation.

Neither is this:
Delta t = INTEGRAL(sqrt(1 - v(T)^2) dT)

In the Lorentz transform, there are three parties --- two observers
and one observed.

Thus, yes, it is still the Lorentz transform where the observed is
also one of the observers.

You really need to learn the basics of the Lorentz transform after
wasting so many years of your life in the sewage of cyberspace. Or
even better, start with the Galilean transform and understand it
fully.

My dearest imbecile,

Don't try to kiss my *ss. If you want more sperm, ask your buddy
Gisse.

*this* is what we regular folks, call the
Lorentz transformation:
x' = g ( x - v t )
t' = g ( t - v x/c^2 )

And this is wrong. The Lorentz transform is not about global
coordinate transformation but discrete transformation. Properly
written, it is using your style of notion as follows.

** dx' = g (dx - v dt)
** dt' = g (dt - v dx / c^2)

The time integral
Delta t = INTEGRAL( sqrt(1 - v(T)^2) ( 1 + a(T) X(T) ) dT )
can be derived from the Lorentz transformation for the instantaneously
comoving inertial frame. For instance
http://www.geocities.com/slithytove5/AccelClocks.htm

Crackpot sighted.

Pure SR, but do yourself a favour: don't try to understand it.
You'll hurt yourself plenty.

Thanks for the warning, but it is too late. I have already read and
understood it. I will get over with my hurting from that BS.

On second thought, please *do* try to understand it.
You'll hurt yourself plenty.

Make up your mind. You are too wishy-washy. <shrug>

No, myopic retard, here's some more, related to other topics:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PrivateLagrang...
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/LonelyTop.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SmellHere.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/TwoMetrics.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/DiffGeoAero.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/FlatSphere.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/ReasonLaws.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/NewLagrangian....
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/LosingIt.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AerospaceRelat...
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/NewPotential.html

Why don't you make a list of all my posts? It would save me a lot of
time to sort through my old posts.

Do you feel guilty to be a crackpot by modifying the Lorentz transform
to fudge the answer you have already known? Doesn't that hurt?

How infinitely stupid you are :-)
Who ever had the brilliant idea to put an imbecile like you on this planet?
Your mother?
And your father?
Are you sure about the latter?

Well, the true low-life in you comes out. You just cannot leave the
family alone, can't you?

So, tell me does it hurt to BETRAY THE RELIGIOUS CULT OF SR AND JOIN
THE CRACKPOT BY INVENTING ANOTHER TRANSFORM THAT DOES NOT WORK.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Lorentz Question: Color me stumped on interchangeability
    ... >> In sci.physics.relativity, Dirk Van de moortel ... >> Yeah, well, my prime error was in fact in misconstruing the Lorentz transform. ... That the observers A and B can be swapped and v replaced with -v. ... Once someone pointed out the correct form of the Lorentz ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: A little challenge for relativists.
    ... Clocks and rulers in motion wrt the ether frame behave as ... >>> described by a Lorentz transform from the ether frame. ... doesn't work anywhere except outside the light cone on spacelike ... for observers who are causally connected, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Understanding Einsteins Math
    ... > In Section 3 there is a derivation of the Lorentz transform based on ... > have tried to fill in the gaps of the derivation, ... We first define tau ... axes (observers) and the "observed lengths" ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Question for OG
    ... vacuum) is measured to be the same for all observers. ... So it gets to violate relative motion right? ... you have to use a Lorentz transform for light to be the same ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: The Mathematician.
    ... > form or symmetry as of the inertial twin below. ... You'll hurt yourself plenty. ... which, since inertiality means A= 0 for all t, reduces to ... not make yours the Lorentz transform. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)