Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.

On Jun 18, 4:36 pm, "Jeckyl" <n...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Dono" <s...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:1182173841.643429.130030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

You didn't really do a very good job of defining it at all. You also
didn't
say in which direction the laser was pointing .. we had to assume you
meant
in the x axis (direction of travel of the train).
You need to learn how to read.
I can .. you need to learn how to write .. you said something that was
COMPLETELY wrong,
No, idiot, you are still unble to understand it, too complicated for
your brain.

I understood what you wrote .. you were simply incomplete and unclear .. and
wrong


If you understood as you claim you will not have any trouble
explaining (with math) the following :

1. Why can light be aberrated towards the rear of the car in
Einstein's experimen.

2. What is the aberration angle in the problem at point 1?

3. How do the equations at point 1 change if the "light clock" is
turned 90 degrees ( horizontally)


and then had another example that was porroly explained.
It was a much simpler problem, you couldn't get that one either.

No .. YOU got it wrong, , dumb ass


Now, now, now little idiot, I explain a few simple things to you and
you call me names. Look in the mirror, you'll find the dumb ass there.


Next time, before you shoot your mouth, ask questions, I will explain
to you.
Next time .. keep your mouth shut to avoid embarrassing yourself.
You are still an idiot after all the mathematical explanations. Too
bad.

You wrote a couple of trig formulas .. that doesn't make you right.

It does, since the formulas and the explanation are correct. If you
had any formal education you would have recognised them and you would
have shut up. In case you don't know, it is quite clear that you are
trying to learn physics (and relativity in specific) from the
different posters. So, be thankful when you get a free lesson and shut
the *** up when you have been proven wrong.



If a
beam of light is vertical in the frame of reference in the train ,it does
NOT seen going backwards (in the opposite direction to the train) from the
FoR of the track

At least you are persistent in terms of repeating the same idiocy, the
main trademark of crackpots. Of course, it is seen backwards from the
FoR of the track:

- try writing the math,

- try thinking about how "separation speed" works when the
trajectories of the two elements involved (light beam and the mirror
attached the the roof) are perpendicular to each other

Both approaches should give you the same result, backwards aberration.
I.e. if you stop being a crank and you learn some physics.




.