Re: Eric Gisse's Bose-Einstein matter is "NOT" a Lorentz scalar

On Jun 17, 11:06 pm, "g...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 17, 4:11 pm, v...@xxxxxxx wrote:





On Jun 17, 12:54 pm, "g...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jun 17, 3:02 pm, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jun 17, 2:35 pm, "g...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

A Bose-Einstein condensate is a state of matter formed at a SPECIFIC
temperature.

Because Eric Gisse INSISTS that Temperature is not a Lorentz Scalar:

...We must be "forced" to believe that the Bose-Einstein condensate's
mass is also not a Lorentz Invariant scalar since it's existance is
temperature dependent.

what you are saying is nonsense

The Bose-Einstein Mass only occurs when a specific lower temperature
is reached = no nonsense.

If the Mass is a Lorentz scalar then this same lower temperature needs
to also be a Lorentz scalar for Mass to be a Lorentz invariant scalar
= no nonsense.

Why?????? Cause a dummy crank says so?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Cause a crank like you can't what I said above is wrong.


- Show quoted text -

You said: "If the Mass is a Lorentz scalar then this same lower
temperature needs
to also be a Lorentz scalar for Mass to be a Lorentz invariant scalar
= no nonsense."

Why? Be specific. I just read it again, haha, what a nitwit. You
should find a new hobby.

.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast