Re: Eric Gisse's Bose-Einstein matter is "NOT" a Lorentz scalar

On Jun 18, 11:12 pm, v...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Jun 17, 11:06 pm, "g...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Jun 17, 4:11 pm, v...@xxxxxxx wrote:

On Jun 17, 12:54 pm, "g...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jun 17, 3:02 pm, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jun 17, 2:35 pm, "g...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

A Bose-Einstein condensate is a state of matter formed at a SPECIFIC
temperature.

Because Eric Gisse INSISTS that Temperature is not a Lorentz Scalar:

...We must be "forced" to believe that the Bose-Einstein condensate's
mass is also not a Lorentz Invariant scalar since it's existance is
temperature dependent.

what you are saying is nonsense

The Bose-Einstein Mass only occurs when a specific lower temperature
is reached = no nonsense.

If the Mass is a Lorentz scalar then this same lower temperature needs
to also be a Lorentz scalar for Mass to be a Lorentz invariant scalar
= no nonsense.

Why?????? Cause a dummy crank says so?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Cause a crank like you can't what I said above is wrong.

- Show quoted text -

You said: "If the Mass is a Lorentz scalar then this same lower
temperature needs
to also be a Lorentz scalar for Mass to be a Lorentz invariant scalar
= no nonsense."

Why? Be specific. I just read it again, haha, what a nitwit. You
should find a new hobby.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You would ask why.

#1. The mass of the water liquid is NOT THE SAME mass of this same
liquid heated into a gas vapor.

#2. The liquid will no longer be a liquid but a vapor this goes
AGAINST the rules of RELATIVITY where NOTHING changes on the same
reference frame of the observer.

Conclusion if the temperature has to behave in the EXACT SAME
FASHION(DEGREE) as the mass, for this to occur BOTH NEED TO BE LORENTZ
INVARIANT SCALARS.

(one can't go left while the other goes right....capich)

.

Relevant Pages