Re: My friend Newton laughs at Tom Roberts' Synchrotron Radiation

On Jun 19, 6:26 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 18, 8:17 pm, "g...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Jun 18, 12:30 pm, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jun 16, 3:11 am, "g...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Laughter managed to wake my friend Newton from his grave.

Every time you post one of these threads with somebody's
name in it, you show yourself to be an idiot, you show
that you are completely misunderstanding what that
person said, and you show that you are completely
misunderstanding everything you have read.

Here are the blatant idiocies in this one:

I told him they're taking the "wording" of centrifugal acceleration as
a literal behavior and FORCING this terminology only on the electron
but not on the planets or other physical objects.

All changes in direction are accelerations. This applies
to planets as well as electrons.

Nobody has said otherwise. You have blatantly misunderstood
the point about change of direction and the word acceleration.

I said they're trying to exchange polar coordinates with cartesian
coordinates and call it a literal acceleration and therefore change of
velocity.

Velocity is a vector. Change of velocity implies > acceleration,

1. Momentum (and orbital momentum) is conserved.

First things first. A circular orbit at constant speed is NOT a case
of conserved momentum. It is a case of constantly changed momentum. Do
not confuse constant speed with constant momentum.



Velocity is always in relation for something "else" around you for
some reason.

Black plane windows and you wouldn't know if your speed same, faster,
slower.

Although in the above constant angular momentum, insteat of constant
momentum (linear momentum).







2. An increase of speed absorbs photons (radiation).

3. #3 cannot go further unless #2 is true.

by definition. You have blatantly misunderstood this point
which is easily grasped by children every day.

They're making fire out of smoke and then fire again (3steps) instead
of simply smoke out of fire(2 steps).

The simple two steps:

declining velocity = radiation emission
increasing velocity = radiation absorption

You have blatantly misunderstood everything you have heard
about synchrotron radiation, which is that when an
electron changes direction, it radiates.

You have blatantly missed the difference between electrons
and planets, which is that electrons have charge and
planets do not, and synchrotron radiation is an effect
that happens with charged bodies. It is predicted by
Maxwell's equations.

Your record is back to normal: Every single sentence
you have stated in this post is wrong. Every one. And
not wrong in a small way, but blatantly, grossly,
idiotically wrong in ways that could be explained to
children.

- Randy- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: My friend Newton laughs at Tom Roberts Synchrotron Radiation
    ... but not on the planets or other physical objects. ... Momentum is conserved. ... electron changes direction, it radiates. ... and synchrotron radiation is an effect ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: QM and electron orbits
    ... why the electron does not radiate in this ground state. ... one would have to know the position as well as the momentum. ... one can regard *any* particle to be in a superposition ... *radius* of a classical orbits. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: QM and electron orbits
    ... why the electron does not radiate in this ground state. ... one would have to know the position as well as the momentum. ... one can regard *any* particle to be in a superposition ... *radius* of a classical orbits. ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: QM and electron orbits
    ... >>of states with definite momentum. ... you were only talking about the uncertainty *in position*? ... Simply describe the motion. ... > interchangeably hwen talking about the state of an electron. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: QM and electron orbits
    ... >>of states with definite momentum. ... you were only talking about the uncertainty *in position*? ... Simply describe the motion. ... > interchangeably hwen talking about the state of an electron. ...
    (sci.astro)