Re: Ping PMB on Modern SpaceTime (MST).
- From: Bilge <dubious@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Jun 2007 12:04:47 GMT
On 2007-06-21, Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 20, 9:29 pm, "Pmb" <som...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Eric Gisse" <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1182298900.880014.126310@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jun 19, 10:47 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello Mr. Peter Brown.
I've been examining the ISU's 1983 decision
on equating Length to c*Time in a series of
preliminary brief's here...(see Modern SpaceTime),
Sorry Ken but I'm not familiar with that decision. What does "ISU" stand
for?
http://physics.trak4.com/
You don't know what you are talking about.
Is there a need to say this to Ken? Is this a sincere response, an attempt
to correct what you see as an error or are you simply being sarcastic and
insulting him??
Yes, there is a need. If he is never challenged, he will think what he
is posting is without error. On the other hand, correcting the error
is a waste of my time because a) he will not understand and b) will
not change his actions.
Ken will never learn. He thinks that bluster and posturing are
a substitute for content - same as the rest of the kooks any time
they are asked to actually calculate something.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ping PMB on Modern SpaceTime (MST).
- From: Pmb
- Re: Ping PMB on Modern SpaceTime (MST).
- References:
- Ping PMB on Modern SpaceTime (MST).
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Ping PMB on Modern SpaceTime (MST).
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Ping PMB on Modern SpaceTime (MST).
- From: Pmb
- Re: Ping PMB on Modern SpaceTime (MST).
- From: Eric Gisse
- Ping PMB on Modern SpaceTime (MST).
- Prev by Date: Re: Ping PMB on Modern SpaceTime (MST).
- Next by Date: Re: Supersolidity and the breakdown of the General Relativity Equivalence Principle
- Previous by thread: Re: Ping PMB on Modern SpaceTime (MST).
- Next by thread: Re: Ping PMB on Modern SpaceTime (MST).
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
