Re: Relativity: Einstein's lost frame
- From: Surfer <surfer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:21:48 +0930
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:21:49 GMT, Tom Roberts
<tjroberts137@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That is completely true. But then in science the meaning of terms
In particular, this "absolute motion" that is compatible with SR is not
at all the "absolute motion" of Newton or Maxwell. Beware of PUNs.
evolve as researchers learn more about the phenomenon they refer to.
For example, the modern picture of an atom is very different to the
Bohr model.
-- Surfer
.
- References:
- Relativity: Einstein's lost frame
- From: Surfer
- Re: Relativity: Einstein's lost frame
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Relativity: Einstein's lost frame
- From: Surfer
- Re: Relativity: Einstein's lost frame
- From: harry
- Re: Relativity: Einstein's lost frame
- From: Surfer
- Re: Relativity: Einstein's lost frame
- From: Tom Roberts
- Relativity: Einstein's lost frame
- Prev by Date: Re: Relativity: Einstein's lost frame
- Next by Date: Re: THE PYTHAGORAS THEOREM.
- Previous by thread: Re: Relativity: Einstein's lost frame
- Next by thread: Re: Relativity: Einstein's lost frame
- Index(es):