Re: magnets curves space geometrically
- From: "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 04:03:33 -0700
On Jun 24, 7:46 am, John Smith <e6k8s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
a permanent magnet curves space-time for grain
of ferrous material
there is no difference, even tha equations are tha same
and if you put a mechanical watch close to a magnet, he
will tick slower
I would take that as a quantitative absoulte but the
analogy has some merit. Einstein even refers to
acceleration induction in his Nobel lecture.
<< I shall turn to those problems which are
related to the development which I have
traced. Already Newton recognized that the
law of inertia is unsatisfactory
in a context so far unmentioned in this
exposition, namely that it gives no
real cause for the special physical
position of the states of motion of the
inertial frames relative to all other
states of motion. It makes the observable
material bodies responsible for the
gravitational behaviour of a material
point, yet indicates no material cause
for the inertial behaviour of the material
point but devises the cause for it
(absolute space or inertial ether). This
is not logically inadmissible although
it is unsatisfactory. For this reason
E. Mach demanded a modification of the
law of inertia in the sense that the
inertia should be interpreted as an
acceleration resistance of the bodies
against one another and not against "space".
This interpretation governs the expectation
that accelerated bodies have concordant
accelerating action in the same
sense on other bodies (acceleration induction).
This interpretation is even more
plausible according to general relativity
which eliminates the distinction between
inertial and gravitational effects.
It amounts to stipulating that, apart
from the arbitrariness governed by the
free choice of coordinates, the
gm v -field shall be completely determined
by the matter. Mach's stipulation is favoured
in general relativity by the circumstance
that acceleration induction in accordance
with the gravitational field equations really
exists, although of such slight intensity
that direct detection by mechanical experiments
is out of the question. >>
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1921/einstein-lecture.html
If you treat magnetism as a dipolar induction
(one axis of symmetry) and
gravity as an isotropic induction (no axis of symmetry)
you might even find some equaions that look right.
Not to prejudice your brain-storming, but here
is some related work
http://www.chem.purdue.edu/gchelp/liquids/inddip.html
<<...Identifying the antipodal points after a parity reversal,
far infrared coherent modes arise in their local realm of the
Universe, to which the local oscillators intrinsically
partake, inducing gravity. >>
http://www.mypage.bluewin.ch/Bizarre/GRAV.htm
"Tajmar de Matos"
http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/GSP/SEM0L6OVGJE_0.html
A. K. T. Assis,
Gravitation as a fourth order electromagnetic effect,
In: Advanced Electromagnetism: Foundations,
Theory and Applications,
T. W. Barrett and D. M. Grimes (eds.),
(World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), pp. 314-331.
Abstract: We present a generalized Weber's law for
electromagnetism including terms of fourth and higher
orders in 1/c. These extra terms when applied to the
force between two neutral dipoles yield an equivalent
to Newton's law of universal gravitation as a fourth
order electromagnetic effect.
http://www.ifi.unicamp.br/~assis/gravitation-4th-order-p314-331(1995).pdf
http://www.ifi.unicamp.br/~assis/wpapers.htm
Sue...
.
- Prev by Date: Re: No more black holes? (To appear in Phys Rev D)
- Next by Date: Re: magnets curves space geometrically
- Previous by thread: Re: magnets curves space geometrically
- Next by thread: Re: magnets curves space geometrically
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
